Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@prusswan wrote: It depends on how the framework is used and its reputation with respect to stability (or availability of stable releases). I don't really want to adopt a js framework that is even...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@jakehow wrote: If anyone hast any tricks they are using to get idempotent builds (or close) I would love to hear them. Started a new thread here ->...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@mcwumbly wrote: Coincidentally, I was chatting about this topic with some folks the other day. We were all devs who believe strongly in shipping continuously to our clients, but asked the question,...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@2468ben wrote: Ok, how about this: Would anyone like to work on a little Ember site that scrapes/api-calls a bunch of these different sources and shows some recent lists on one page? Sort them all by...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@stefan wrote: 2468ben: Would anyone like to work on a little Ember site that scrapes/api-calls a bunch of these different sources and shows some recent lists on one page? Sort them all by date,...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@tarasm wrote: EmberWeekly/EmberWatch/EmberFlare & EmberSherpa are starting to work on this. Would you like to help us make it happen? Read full topic
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@stefan wrote: and yes, i would love curated questions to bubble up to me. It is extremely hard to keep up with how fast the community it growing, I would love to go over each and every question and...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@2468ben wrote: Yes, I sure would. I'll send you a message. It's great to hear that you all are already starting to work together on things. Read full topic
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@2468ben wrote: On a related note to the release cycle, is there somewhere in the guides (or on the main pages) that links to the Road to 2.0, future-proofing, etc.? I'm personally aware of all the...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@fpauser wrote: We use ember since its "sproutcore-2.0-days" for multiple applications in production. In the ember-0.x-days upgrades often required quite some research + refactoring. Since ember-1.0...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@sandstrom wrote: We've certainly felt upgrade pain — we've used Ember since before it was called »Ember«. Also, we're a 1 person tech team (myself) at a small startup. However, I like the current...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@Gaurav0 wrote: I'm very glad to see the core team has admitted in their meeting that "there are real issues" and that an LTS release is not really a solution. Notes here:...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@domchristie wrote: Gaurav0: I hope to once again emphasize that API churn, not a fast release cycle, is the real problem. I feel like the the two are inextricably linked: Gaurav0: Lack of...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@wycats wrote: domchristie: Either the changes are too big to be documented in time, or the release cycles are too short, or perhaps both. I think this hits the nail on the head. The problem isn't...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@Gaurav0 wrote: wycats: The problem isn't necessarily churn intrinsically, but rather that we are shipping features without meeting all of the requirements for a new feature. Totally disagree. The...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@wycats wrote: Gaurav0: When you have 25+ (counting all 1.13 Ember releases together) classes and methods deprecated and then removed just six weeks later, more documentation cannot fix the upgrade...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@Gaurav0 wrote: I am talking about 25+ deprecations, not releases, that is classes and methods deprecated in 1.13.x due to be removed in just a few weeks. Read full topic
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@kylecoberly wrote: Is not 1.13 not kind of a special case though? As the last of the 1.x series, I think it's been stated elsewhere that 1.13 will continue to get patched for a while longer to...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@wycats wrote: kylecoberly: Is not 1.13 not kind of a special case though? As the last of the 1.x series, I think it's been stated elsewhere that 1.13 will continue to get patched for a while longer...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@Bob_Myers wrote: Great conversation. My two cents, expanding on some points others have made: I get the point that developers can choose how often to upgrade. Let's say I'm on Ember 1.11 and want to...
View Article