Clik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@wycats wrote: Gaurav0: When you have 25+ (counting all 1.13 Ember releases together) classes and methods deprecated and then removed just six weeks later, more documentation cannot fix the upgrade...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@Gaurav0 wrote: I am talking about 25+ deprecations, not releases, that is classes and methods deprecated in 1.13.x due to be removed in just a few weeks. Read full topic
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@kylecoberly wrote: Is not 1.13 not kind of a special case though? As the last of the 1.x series, I think it's been stated elsewhere that 1.13 will continue to get patched for a while longer to...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@wycats wrote: kylecoberly: Is not 1.13 not kind of a special case though? As the last of the 1.x series, I think it's been stated elsewhere that 1.13 will continue to get patched for a while longer...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@Bob_Myers wrote: Great conversation. My two cents, expanding on some points others have made: I get the point that developers can choose how often to upgrade. Let's say I'm on Ember 1.11 and want to...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@pixelhandler wrote: So I'm thinking… What would motivate app developers to participate in some kind of beta feedback program? I work on an app that has been around for 1-3 years (actually a group of...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@Gaurav0 wrote: wycats: Yes. 1.13 is the only release so far that has included deprecations to public APIs that will be removed in the next release. The next time that will happen will be in the...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@Wayne_Douglas wrote: Isn't 1.13 just 2.0 in reality? 2.0 wasn't really a release no? Read full topic
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@jthoburn wrote: Feature wise, yes, internally no. 2.0 drops deprecated features, IE8 support, etc which leads to 2.0 being a slimmer library with better performance. Read full topic
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@donz wrote: As a real old timer I would like to comment on the (frustrations of the ember) release cycle. brag/ My old-timer credentials: First computer used vacuum tubes, drum memory and MUCH paper...
View ArticleIs the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@pixelhandler wrote: @donz well said, It may get better soon the core team has said a few times that they won't merge features without docs and there is doc team working on updating the tutorials. But...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Is the six-week release cycle too frequent?
@xcambar wrote: donz: have taken to ignoring any tutorials/posts dated before April 2015 Exactly my situation. I have found a decent, hard-won and mostly manual workflow for updating code and staying...
View Article